This page contains affiliate links — as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

X-Plane 12 Performance Score

78 / 100
X-Plane 12 Score
Sim Seat · Next Level Racing
Budget
Value score 9.76 per $100 spent
Mount Compatibility (30%) 60
Adjustability (25%) 90
Build Quality (25%) 90
Footprint (10%) 50
Value (10%) 100

Next Level Racing Flight Simulator Boeing Heavy Package scores 78.0/100; adjustability (25% weight) is the dominant factor at 90/100.

Verdict for X-Plane 12

The Next Level Racing Flight Racing Boeing Heavy Package scores 78.0/100 for X-Plane 12, with metal construction and wide adjustability range keeping you locked in position during long VFR cross-country legs or turbulence-heavy approaches into KLAX. Built for sim pilots who want a stable, ergonomic foundation for their controls rig, though its specific mount compatibility limits which yoke and throttle quadrant hardware it can integrate cleanly.

Reviewed: March 2026

Full Specifications

Connection N/A
Force Feedback No
Axis Count 0
Button Count 0
Compatibility PC
Release Year 2022

Pros & Cons for X-Plane 12

Pros

  • Metal frame resists racking and flex during sustained rudder pedal input on crosswind approaches into tight strips — at the budget tier, most competing seats use plastic chassis that introduce unwanted movement when your feet are loaded up on the pedals.
  • Height and recline adjustability score 90/100, meaning you can dial in eye-level positioning for VR headset use during X-Plane 12 city flyovers without fighting neck strain through long photogrammetry sessions.
  • Boeing-profile seat geometry keeps you in a natural column-grip posture across multi-hour online multiplayer sessions on VATSIM — a fit that budget alternatives with generic racing-seat bases simply don't replicate for airliner-style flying.

Cons

  • Mount compatibility scores only 60/100, which surfaces immediately when you try to bolt a full throttle quadrant and yoke column to the frame — not all third-party control hardware integrates without adapter plates or workarounds, and you'll feel that gap during a dense EGLL approach where every control needs to be exactly where you trained it.
  • No integrated control mounting side-arms or seat-rail extensions compared to mid-range cockpit frames, meaning pilots running rudder pedals, yoke, throttle, and trim wheel simultaneously will hit ergonomic compromise that a step-up rig would eliminate entirely.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this a good Sim Seat for X-Plane 12?
78.0/100 for X-Plane 12 makes this a competent budget-tier foundation for cockpit builds running blade-element physics with full control setups. It excels during structured airliner sessions where the Boeing seat profile and height adjustability let you maintain consistent yoke reach and rudder pedal angle across hours of VATSIM-controlled airspace. Where it shows limits is in mixed-hardware rigs — if you're running a full Captain's package with column yoke, separate throttle quadrant, and rudder pedals, the 60/100 mount compatibility score means you may need supplementary mounting solutions that a dedicated cockpit frame would handle natively.
Is it worth the price for X-Plane 12?
At the budget tier, metal construction is not a given — this seat's all-metal frame gives it a rigidity advantage over the fabric-over-plastic builds that dominate this price bracket. The 90/100 adjustability subscore adds genuine long-session value that cheaper fixed-geometry seats can't match, though you're accepting real mount compatibility trade-offs versus spending up to a mid-range integrated cockpit platform.
What should I look for in a Sim Seat for X-Plane 12?
Mount compatibility matters in X-Plane 12 because the sim rewards precise, repeatable control inputs — if your yoke column or throttle quadrant is shifting relative to your body mid-flight, blade-element physics will punish inconsistent inputs on short-field landings or steep VOR approaches where trim authority is narrow. Adjustability is equally critical because X-Plane 12's VR implementation demands your head and hands land in exactly the right position relative to the virtual panel, and a seat you can't dial in for height and recline forces compromise between headset comfort and control reach. The Next Level Racing Flight Simulator Boeing Heavy Package addresses adjustability well at 90/100 but carries a 60/100 mount compatibility score, which is the primary friction point keeping the overall rating at 78.0/100 rather than higher.
Is the Next Level Racing Flight Simulator Boeing Heavy Package compatible with X-Plane 12?
The Next Level Racing Flight Simulator Boeing Heavy Package is a seat and rig frame — it has no direct USB or software interface with X-Plane 12, so there is no driver setup or axis binding required from the seat itself. All control hardware mounted to the frame (yoke, throttle, rudder pedals) will still require individual binding through X-Plane 12's joystick and equipment settings panel as normal for each device.
How should I configure this in X-Plane 12?
Since this is a seat platform rather than an input device, there are no in-game sensitivity or dead zone settings that apply to the seat directly — configure those parameters on whichever yoke, rudder pedal, and throttle hardware you mount to the frame. For airliner-style flying in X-Plane 12 from this seating position, set your primary flight axis sensitivity curves to a moderate linear profile with a 3–5% null zone on rudder to absorb any minor positional shift from the seat under load.

Compare Alternatives

Compare with something else