This page contains affiliate links — as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
X-Plane 12 Performance Score
Honeycomb Aeronautical Bravo Rudder Pedals scores 67.3/100; buildQuality (30% weight) is the dominant factor at 70/100.
Verdict for X-Plane 12
The Honeycomb Aeronautical Bravo Rudder Pedals scores 67.3/100 for X-Plane 12, offering a hybrid-build three-axis setup that holds its line during crosswind corrections on dense ILS approaches without axis slop. Best suited to sim pilots stepping up from keyboard or twist-grip rudder control, though the lack of hydraulic damping limits precision feel during slow-speed taxiing and VR immersion.
Reviewed: March 2026
Full Specifications
| Connection | USB |
| Force Feedback | No |
| Axis Count | 3 |
| Button Count | 0 |
| Compatibility | PC |
| Release Year | 2023 |
Pros & Cons for X-Plane 12
Pros
- ↑ The hybrid construction keeps the pedal frame stable under repetitive differential braking during ground roll after short-field landings — at the budget tier, most alternatives flex noticeably under the same load, making this one of the more solid options without moving up a price bracket.
- ↑ X-Plane 12 auto-detects all three axes on USB plug-in, so yaw, left toe brake, and right toe brake are bindable within the control settings panel without third-party drivers — useful when reconfiguring quickly between different aircraft profiles like the Zibo 737 and a GA Cessna in the same session.
- ↑ Medium spring resistance gives enough centering feedback to hold coordinated flight on long VFR cross-country legs without constant micro-corrections, which matters in X-Plane 12's blade-element physics model where rudder slip actually costs airspeed — competitors at this price often use lighter springs that leave you chasing the ball.
Cons
- ↓ No hydraulic damping means pedal travel feels abrupt during slow-speed ground maneuvering on narrow taxiways — in X-Plane 12's accurate ground physics, overcorrection on wet or grass surfaces is easy to trigger, and the lack of resistance graduation makes fine-tug tiller-style inputs harder to modulate.
- ↓ The adjustability subscore of 60/100 reflects a limited heel-plate range — pilots with longer legs flying VR city flyovers in a fixed cockpit position will notice the pedal-to-seat geometry doesn't dial in as precisely as mid-range units that offer multi-position rail adjustment and toe-brake angle customization.
Frequently Asked Questions
Compare Alternatives
Honeycomb Aeronautical Bravo Rudder Pedals vs Virpil Controls VPC ACE-TORQ Rudder Pedals
Compare →Honeycomb Aeronautical Bravo Rudder Pedals vs MFG Crosswind V3 Rudder Pedals
Compare →Honeycomb Aeronautical Bravo Rudder Pedals vs Logitech G Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedals
Compare →Honeycomb Aeronautical Bravo Rudder Pedals vs Thrustmaster TFRP T.Flight Rudder Pedals
Compare →