Simulator Hardware Hardware Rankings
X-Plane 12
Overkill

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD

ASUS ROG · Pre-Built Desktop PC

Check Price →

This page contains affiliate links — as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

X-Plane 12 Performance Score

92.55 / 100
X-Plane 12 Score
Pre-Built Desktop PC · ASUS ROG
Overkill VR READY
Value score 26.45 per $100 spent
cpu (45%) 92
gpu (55%) 93

Strong GPU score drives performance in this 55% GPU-weighted game, yielding a total score of 92.5.

Verdict for X-Plane 12

Estimated at 90+ fps at 1440p Ultra and stable 90 Hz in VR, the ASUS ROG Strix GT35 scores 92.6/100 for X-Plane 12 — among the highest derived ratings at this tier. Built for sim pilots who want headroom in photogrammetry zones and dense VR approaches without tuning a custom build; the trade-off is a steep flagship price over a self-built equivalent.

Reviewed: March 2026

Full Specifications

Release Year 2024

Pros & Cons for X-Plane 12

Pros

  • ↑ RTX 4090 should sustain estimated 90 Hz locked in VR through high-density photogrammetry zones like New York or London city flyovers without dropping into ASW — GPU headroom that lower-tier cards can't hold at equivalent render scaling.
  • ↑ 24GB GDDR6X VRAM handles X-Plane 12's texture-heavy PBR weather system and high-res orthophoto scenery simultaneously — at this price tier, most prebuilt alternatives ship with 16GB VRAM cards that force texture compromises at 4K Ultra.
  • ↑ 64GB DDR5 paired with the Core Ultra 9 285K leaves substantial runway for X-Plane 12's expansion via heavy plugin stacks — running xPilot for VATSIM online sessions alongside Real Weather Connector and Zibo 737 won't starve background threads the way 32GB configs do during long-haul cruise.

Cons

  • ↓ Even with the RTX 4090, estimated 4K Ultra fps in X-Plane 12 during a dense EGLL ground approach with 100% AI traffic and live weather active is likely to dip toward the 60–70 fps range — not a ceiling issue, but 4K VR at full Ultra settings remains out of reach for stable 90 Hz.
  • ↓ The value score of 26.5 per tier-unit spent reflects the flagship premium — a custom-configured tower at this price point could net equivalent or better single-core clock tuning on the 285K, whereas the ROG Strix GT35's BIOS is partially locked, limiting aggressive per-core OC for X-Plane 12's physics thread.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this a good Pre-Built Desktop PC for X-Plane 12?
The ASUS ROG Strix GT35 scores 92.6/100 for X-Plane 12, placing it at the top of the derived performance tier. It excels during VR city flyovers over photogrammetry-heavy regions and dense EGLL approaches at 1440p Ultra, where the RTX 4090 maintains estimated frame rates well above the ASW threshold. Its limits appear at native 4K Ultra with simultaneous VR output and maxed AI traffic, where even the 4090 begins to show the ceiling of X-Plane 12's GPU demand curve.
Can I use a VR headset with this PC?
Based on the RTX 4090's GPU tier, expect estimated 90 Hz stable in X-Plane 12 VR at high-to-ultra render scaling — this targets Reverb G2-class and Varjo Aero headsets running at native resolution without reprojection. For Quest 3 users via Air Link or a PCVR cable, full Ultra settings with 150% render scale should be well within reach. Photogrammetry cities like Sydney or Chicago may still cause brief frame dips requiring ASW engagement if ultra render scaling is combined with live weather volumetric clouds at maximum density.
Is it worth the price for X-Plane 12?
At the flagship tier for X-Plane 12, the 92.6/100 composite score and 24GB VRAM spec represent the ceiling of current prebuilt performance, but the value score of 26.5 reflects the cost of the prebuilt convenience tax — you are paying for integration, warranty, and build quality rather than raw component-per-dollar efficiency. If BIOS-level tuning and per-core overclocking for X-Plane 12's physics thread matter to you, a custom build at this tier can extract more single-core performance from the same 285K silicon.
Is X-Plane 12 more CPU or GPU demanding?
X-Plane 12 weights GPU performance at 55% and CPU at 45%, meaning the RTX 4090 carries the heavier share of the composite 92.6 score — and it shows, with the GPU scoring 93/100 versus the CPU's 92/100. The Core Ultra 9 285K is not a bottleneck in any current X-Plane 12 scenario, but its single-core performance headroom is what keeps physics calculations and plugin threads from capping frame rates during complex VATSIM sessions at busy online hubs.
How should I configure this in X-Plane 12?
Run X-Plane 12 at Ultra preset with render scaling at 100% for 1440p targeting a stable 90 fps, or push render scaling to 150% at 1440p for near-4K quality while staying above the 72 fps VR threshold. For native 4K on a monitor, Ultra at 100% render scaling should sustain an estimated 65–75 fps — sufficient for smooth operation, though dropping shadows one notch recovers headroom during peak-load dense airport sequences.

Also Good For

MSFS

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024

93.6

/100

MSFS favours CPU — this machine's Intel Core Ultra 9 285K scores 92/100.

Compare Alternatives

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core i9-14900KF, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super, 32GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core i9-14900KF, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super 16GB, 32GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs CLX SET Gaming Desktop – AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, 32GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs CLX SET Gaming Desktop – AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 16GB, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC Computer Desktop SlateMR 267i (2024) – Intel Core i7-14700F, RTX 4070 Super, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC Computer Desktop SlateMR 267i – Intel Core i7-14700F, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB, 16GB DDR4, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs Skytech Shiva Gaming PC Desktop – Intel Core i5-13600KF, RTX 4060 Ti, 16GB DDR4, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs Skytech Chronos Gaming PC Desktop – Intel Core i5-13400F, RTX 4060 8GB, 16GB DDR4, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →
Compare with something else