This page contains affiliate links — as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

MSFS Performance Score

93.6 / 100
MSFS Score
Pre-Built Desktop PC · ASUS ROG
Overkill VR READY
Value score 26.75 per $100 spent
cpu (45%) 92
gpu (40%) 93
vramGb (10%) 100
ramGb (5%) 100

Solid CPU performance contributes 41.4 pts (45% weight), with a combined score of 93.6.

Benchmark Data

FPS figures sourced from community benchmarks or derived from component scores. Derived estimates are clearly labelled.

Setting FPS Date
1080p Ultra
2026-03-01
1440p Ultra
2026-03-01
4K Ultra
2026-03-01

Verdict for MSFS

Scoring 93.6/100, the ROG Strix GT35 should achieve an estimated 85–95fps at 4K Ultra in MSFS 2024, making it one of the few prebuilts that handles photogrammetry zones and live weather without reaching for DLSS as a crutch. This is the pick for sim pilots who want flagship GPU headroom for VR city flyovers without hand-building a rig.

Reviewed: March 2026

Full Specifications

Release Year 2024

Pros & Cons for MSFS

Pros

  • The RTX 4090 should sustain an estimated 75–85fps during dense EGLL approaches at 4K Ultra with 100% AI traffic enabled — enough margin to avoid ASW triggering mid-final even with live weather active.
  • The Core Ultra 9 285K brings strong single-core throughput and improved hybrid architecture; at this flagship price tier, most competing prebuilts pair RTX 4090 cards with last-gen CPUs that bleed main-thread performance on terrain streaming and AI system load.
  • 64GB DDR5 means MSFS 2024's aggressive scenery cache and add-on ecosystem — heavy ORBX regions, REX weather injectors, and AI traffic suites running simultaneously — won't force a RAM upgrade for the foreseeable sim generation.

Cons

  • Even with 24GB VRAM, estimated frame times at 4K Ultra inside photogrammetry-heavy zones like Manhattan or Tokyo with full AI traffic and volumetric clouds on Ultra may show variance spikes — this is an MSFS 2024 engine ceiling issue the hardware can't fully override.
  • The value score of 26.8 per $1,000 spent sits at the lower end of flagship-tier efficiency; custom-built rigs at this tier can push meaningfully higher scores per dollar spent, so you're paying a real premium for the prebuilt convenience and ASUS ROG integration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this a good Pre-Built Desktop PC for MSFS?
The ROG Strix GT35 scores 93.6/100 for MSFS 2024, placing it at the top of the prebuilt performance tier. It excels during VR city flyovers over photogrammetry zones — the RTX 4090's 24GB VRAM buffer handles texture streaming without the stutter that plagues 12GB cards in those corridors. Its practical ceiling appears during simultaneous 4K rendering with live weather, heavy AI traffic, and Ultra clouds, where MSFS 2024's main thread can still introduce frame time variance regardless of GPU headroom.
What framerate can I expect at 1080p?
Based on the RTX 4090 and Core Ultra 9 285K tier, expect an estimated 130–150fps at 1080p Ultra in MSFS 2024 — at this resolution the CPU main thread becomes the limiting factor before the GPU is fully loaded. Dropping AI traffic complexity and weather detail further shifts the bottleneck back toward the CPU, not the GPU.
What framerate can I expect at 1440p?
At 1440p Ultra, the GT35 should achieve an estimated 95–115fps in MSFS 2024 under typical conditions including live weather and moderate AI traffic. DLSS Quality at 1440p is worth enabling during photogrammetry-heavy legs — it reclaims GPU headroom with minimal perceptible sharpness loss at sim-speed viewing distances.
Is 4K gaming viable?
At 4K Ultra, estimated performance lands around 75–90fps under standard MSFS 2024 conditions — dense airport approaches with full weather may push toward the lower end of that range. TAA is sufficient for most 4K sessions; DLSS Quality is the lever to pull when AI traffic, volumetric clouds Ultra, and photogrammetry terrain load simultaneously.
Can I use a VR headset with this PC?
The RTX 4090 is the current ceiling for VR in MSFS 2024 — estimated headset-rendered fps should hold 72–90fps on Reverb G2-class and Quest 3 at High-to-Ultra settings with 100% render scale. Pimax Crystal or wider FOV headsets will stress the GPU more and may require dropping to 80% render scale to maintain smooth reprojection-free sessions. Photogrammetry city flyovers in VR remain the hardest test — expect ASW to engage occasionally over dense urban tiles even at this GPU tier.
Is it worth the price for MSFS?
At the flagship tier, the GT35 delivers legitimate top-end MSFS 2024 performance in a ready-to-fly prebuilt package, but the value score of 26.8 reflects the prebuilt tax — custom flagship builds at similar spend can extract more composite performance per dollar. If rack-and-fly convenience and ASUS ROG's thermal and warranty integration matter to your setup, the trade-off is defensible; if raw sim performance per dollar is the priority, the case is harder to make.
Is MSFS more CPU or GPU demanding?
MSFS 2024 weights CPU at 45% and GPU at 40% of composite score, which means single-core throughput and multi-thread AI traffic handling matter nearly as much as raw render speed — the Core Ultra 9 285K scores 92/100 on CPU, providing strong main-thread headroom for complex weather and traffic loads. The RTX 4090 at 93/100 GPU with 24GB VRAM means VRAM is not the bottleneck here — the practical ceiling is MSFS 2024's engine threading under extreme combined loads, not any individual hardware constraint.
How should I configure this in MSFS?
For standard 4K monitor sessions, run MSFS 2024 at Ultra preset with TAA and render scaling at 100% — the GT35 should hold above 60fps locked across the majority of flight scenarios at this setting. For VR targeting a stable 72fps on Reverb G2-class headsets, start at High preset with 90% render scaling and enable DLSS Balanced if photogrammetry cities cause frame time spikes.

Compare Alternatives

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core i9-14900KF, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super, 32GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core i9-14900KF, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super 16GB, 32GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs CLX SET Gaming Desktop – AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, 32GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs CLX SET Gaming Desktop – AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 16GB, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC Computer Desktop SlateMR 267i (2024) – Intel Core i7-14700F, RTX 4070 Super, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC Computer Desktop SlateMR 267i – Intel Core i7-14700F, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB, 16GB DDR4, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs Skytech Shiva Gaming PC Desktop – Intel Core i5-13600KF, RTX 4060 Ti, 16GB DDR4, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →

ASUS ROG Strix GT35 Gaming Desktop – Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD vs Skytech Chronos Gaming PC Desktop – Intel Core i5-13400F, RTX 4060 8GB, 16GB DDR4, 1TB NVMe SSD

Compare →
Compare with something else